Let's TALK About Leadership- Trump's Leadership Debriefing...

Leadership isn’t just about being in charge—it’s about building, inspiring, and creating a vision that others can rally around. But what we’ve seen with Trump isn’t leadership. It’s something else entirely. His approach isn’t a leadership style—it’s a deliberate strategy of discord, division, and dissension. He doesn’t lead people toward something; he pits them against each other. And that’s not leadership—it’s chaos.

Real leadership creates a culture where people grow, where ideas are challenged in a way that leads to progress, and where trust is built. But when leadership is based on fear—fear of the "other side," fear of losing power, fear of change—it doesn’t create unity or strength. It creates instability. Fear-based leadership keeps people in a constant state of outrage and anxiety, making it easier to manipulate them but impossible to build anything lasting. It’s why we see more division than ever, why bipartisanship feels impossible, and why so many people feel exhausted by politics.

A true leader brings people together, even when they don’t agree. They find ways to bridge differences, not widen them. Trump’s approach thrives on conflict because division is the goal—not an unfortunate side effect. And the problem with that? You can’t govern effectively in a system built on constant turmoil. A nation that is always fighting itself will never move forward.

Find the article and video here:

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/liveblog/2025/2/28/donald-trump-live-news-zelenskyy-in-dc-for-talks-on-rare-minerals-deal

Chaos and Disruption is a Strategy

Leadership in America has shifted dramatically, and nowhere is this more evident than in Donald Trump’s bold and disruptive style. His ability to dominate media narratives, energize his base, and keep opponents off balance has made him a force in political strategy. But while unpredictability can be an asset in negotiations, when used as a constant tactic, it creates fatigue, weakens trust in institutions, and makes long-term governance more difficult.

Trump’s direct and often combative, mean-spirited rhetoric has had both immediate and lasting effects. In the short term, his approach resonated with supporters who valued his defiance of political correctness and establishment norms. He commanded attention, controlled conversations, and reinforced loyalty among those who felt unheard. However, the long-term consequences are significant. A leadership style built on personal attacks and division erodes trust, making bipartisan collaboration nearly impossible. While strong leadership requires conviction, it also demands the ability to unify—something that aggressive, winner-takes-all politics makes increasingly difficult.

This shift in leadership norms has broader cultural implications. As a society, we have lost a sense of courtesy, kindness, and our ability to truly listen (not in the Leadership Lounge to be clear). Too often, discussions devolve into echo chambers where viewpoints are dismissed unless they align with the correct political "team." Public discourse is no longer about problem-solving, learning or allowing time for someone to become enlighten from different perspectives and the mosaic of cultures across the United States; it’s about winning or tearing down the opposition. This has fostered deeper divisions rather than understanding.

Leadership should be more than commanding attention—it should create lasting, positive change. Directness and decisiveness have their place, but they must be balanced with diplomacy, respect, and the ability to bring people together. The real question moving forward is whether this combative style has permanently reshaped leadership expectations or if we will find our way to a more collaborative, solution-driven approach. Can we foster a culture where differing opinions are met with thoughtful discussion rather than hostility? The future of leadership—and the strength of our democracy—depends on it.